dissabte, 13 d’abril del 2013

Thatcher vs Sampedro


The Iron Lady and José Luis Sampedro died the same day; maybe it’s the only thing they have ever shared

Margaret Thatcher (aged 87) and José Luis Sampedro (aged 96) both passed away last Monday April the 8th. Although Thatcher (Prime Minister of the United Kingdom for eleven years) is more famous, and she had a very important role in constructing the world we know, Sampedro (writer, humanist and economist) was one of the most important thinkers in Spain.

He was most known as a writer and left thinker, and se was the first and unique
woman to be Prime Minister in the UK. / lecturalia.com & DailiMail.co.uk

In spite of the fact that they died the same day, they probably had never met and, moreover, they probably had never agreed. Thatcher was one (with Ronald Reagan and Milton Friedman) of the most convinced neoliberal ever. Sampedro admitted anarchist in his nineteen, and have been denouncing the neoliberal system for years. They can represent the fight between extreme liberalism and the humanist - left. That’s why we want to put Sampedro and Thatcher front to front.

“There can be no liberty unless there is economic liberty” M. Thatcher
Iron Lady was always convinced that the free market, privatisation and liberalization were the best options to rule the economy. She stood out while Prime Minister for her fights against unions and public system.

“They say that the market is freedom, but I want to know which freedom in the market has someone without a cent. When they speak about liberty, we should ask immediately: who owns this freedom?” J.L. Sampedro
Contrary to Thatcher, Sampedro had always denounced that free-markets don’t promote liberty. He stated lots of times that poor people don’t have any freedom because they don’t have money. He believed that free markets only benefits rich people, who have the real freedom.

“There is no alternative” M. Thatcher
She repeated this tag lots of times. According to her, deregulation and privatisation were the only way to manage the economy. She believed trusted that any other alternative would have fallen and couldn’t have worked. Extreme liberalism was the only way of governing.

“There is always possibilities to do things, but they have to want it” J.L. Sampedro
The Spaniard economist thought very differently to Thatcher. Opposite to TINA (acronym of there is no alternative), he spread that everything is possible with the willing. He claimed to change economic system and he denounced that leaders didn’t want to do it. That’s why he supported indignados movement in Spain.

“Pennies do not come from heaven. They have to be earned here on earth” M. Thatcher
As almost every conservative governor, she didn’t like to finance people who need. Instead, she always demanded people to work hard and earn money by themselves (despite unemployment had a huge increase while she was in government). She didn’t like the government subsidising because it was seen as a distortion in a free market.

“They taught us to be producers and consumers, nor to be free men” J.L. Sampedro
Despite freedom was one of the mantras of Thatcher, it was also very important in Sampedro thinking. He wanted to live in a society built by free men and women, but he believed that it has to be constructed by putting effort in education, and not only in the free market as Iron Lady thought.

“It is not the creation of wealth that is wrong, but the love of money for its own sake.” M. Thatcher
“Money as supreme good leads us to disaster” J.L. Sampedro
Even opposition is the best word to describe what Thatcher and Sampedro thought, they agreed on one thing: avarice is not a good thing. Probably they arrived to this conclusion following very different ways, but they both thought that loving money for its own sake wasn’t a good thing to do. However we  agree with Sampedro or with Thatcher, we would have learned it. The financial downturn we are living tells us that we haven’t.


Cap comentari:

Publica un comentari a l'entrada